Working with the Person at Risk: YP Risk Indicator Checklist
Whether you are using this manual as a tool for teaching about healthy relationships or as a resource for helping YP change their behaviour, it is important to give consideration to any safety issues that may arise from the work. It is likely that your organisation has its own safeguarding procedures around domestic abuse and you should follow these in the first instance. This session on safety is designed as an aid memoire to those processes for practitioners less familiar with working with abuse and the particular issues with safeguarding that can arise when working with intimate partner abuse involving people aged 18 and under.
If the manual is being used as a preventative resource to help improve YP understanding of what constitutes healthy dating behaviour, with you completing sessions from the preventative part of the manual only, then you may not need to complete the safety documents in this session unless someone discloses during the work that they are being abusive.
This session includes an exercise on explaining confidentiality to the YP so they are clear from the outset about the situations in which you will need to share information with others. If a YP does then make a disclosure around harmful behaviour during any future session, you can refer back to Session 1 and complete the necessary assessment of risk and safety planning that is required.
If you are working with a YP who is already known to use violence or abuse in their relationships, you should complete some safety planning work with them prior to beginning the programme to help minimise the risk. A Time Out plan should be created with the YP so they know what to do if they feel they are building up to an abusive incident. This is documented here in Session 1 and in more detail in Session 9 on Anger Management.
If the YP you are working with is in a relationship and/or there is an identified person at risk, then a risk identification checklist should be completed with them. The checklist will help identify risks and determine whether the risk requires information sharing at inter-agency level (ie MARAC: Multi-Agency Risk Assessment Conference). MARAC is a Police-led multi-agency forum for high risk cases. A safety plan should be completed with the individual at risk regardless of whether a referral to MARAC is required and an example of a safety plan is also given in this session to assist you.
If there is a known person at risk from the YP it is best practice to ensure that person has a source of dedicated support from a professional who is separate from this programme delivery with the YP. This could be a victim worker in Youth Justice Service settings, a trusted professional the potential victim is already working with or a new worker allocated from your organisation to undertake the support. They can liaise with the victim to keep updated about safety issues so workers can be aware as soon as possible if there is an escalation of risk. You should liaise with the victim worker after sessions to let them know if you have worries or concerns about a potential threat to the person at risk. It is recommended that the professional doing the victim liaison work checks in with the person at risk on a weekly basis to update the victim about potential issues arising in sessions that will help them manage any risks and have their voice heard.
Some safeguarding considerations when working with children in abusive relationships
All professionals have a responsibility and safeguarding duty to respond to YP at the earliest point possible to prevent exposure to domestic abuse and escalation. A risk threshold should not form the basis for a safeguarding referral: this should be based on child protection guidelines and law. The SafeLives Risk Indicator Checklist informs a practitioner’s understanding of risk but does not provide a threshold for safeguarding.
Relationship abuse towards YP who are under the age of 18 is likely to be a safeguarding issue. Use the Young People’s Checklist (link attached below) to document your decisions and the actions taken in relation to safeguarding referrals and be aware that:
- Where the client is aged 13-15, the experience of relationship abuse is a safeguarding issue and the safeguarding authorities should be made aware of the case. No guarantee of confidentiality can be made to the YP in this situation.
- Where the client is aged 16-18, again the experience of relationship abuse is a safeguarding issue and appropriate referral routes must be followed. However, the MARAC should form part of those routes and should be aligned to the safeguarding process.
SafeLives Young People’s Checklist link: https://safelives.org.uk/node/517
In March 2013 the cross-governmental definition of domestic abuse changed to include YP aged 16-17 years old. The change in definition gave YP the right to access domestic abuse services, previously only available to those aged 18 or older, across England, Northern Ireland and Wales. This means in practice that if you have a named person at risk aged over 16 then they are eligible for referral to specialist domestic abuse services if the risk hits that service’s threshold for acceptance. Children younger than 16 are not eligible for referral to IDVA or domestic abuse services regardless of the risk and are more appropriately supported within Children’s Services. Remember that Child Protection Procedures are subject to change so please see your local safeguarding processes if in doubt.
Session 1 on safety is split into 3 sections. The first focuses on safety for the YP you are working with. The second looks at how to support the person who is at risk and the third concentrates on how to manage worker safety.
- To ensure that any victims or potential victims of domestic abuse are effectively supported
- For the practitioner and person at risk to understand the risks they face
- For the practitioner to be able to assess whether the case requires supervision at multi-agency level
If the YP you are working with is in a relationship and/or there is an identified person at risk from their behaviour, then a risk identification checklist (RIC) should be completed with the person at risk of harm. If that person at risk has an established working relationship with a victim support worker or other practitioner then it is best practice and more responsive for that worker to complete the RIC alongside the person at risk.
The checklist will help identify risks and determine whether the risk requires information sharing at inter-agency level (ie MARAC, Multi- Agency Risk Assessment Conference). MARAC is a Police led multi-agency forum for high risk cases. A safety plan should be completed with the individual at risk regardless of whether a referral to MARAC is required and an example of such is also detailed in the next exercise to assist the practitioner working with the person at risk. The Domestic Abuse, Stalking and Honour Based Violence (DASH) Risk Identification Checklist (RIC) was launched in 2009 based on international research and it focuses on common key indicators of risk recorded across hundreds of cases of domestic homicide and serious harm. It is a tool used to assess the immediate risk, threat and danger the person at risk is subject to.
In 2014 the Young People’s RIC (Risk Identification Checklist) was created and piloted for use with people under the age of 18 years old. It has useful prompts in relation to the types of issues relevant to young people and their relationships. It can be viewed as a handout at the end of this exercise.
If the person at risk is aged 18 or over then the adult version of the RIC should be used and this can be accessed via the SafeLives website using the links below. There is also full guidance on completing the checklist if required.
NI Dash without guidance FINAL.pdf (safelives.org.uk) Dash without guidance.pdf (safelives.org.uk)
If the person at risk answers yes to 14 or more questions then a referral should be made to your local MARAC panel. If the total is under 14 but it is considered there is a significant risk of serious harm or homicide then the reasons should be documented in the Professional Judgment section and the document sent to your local MARAC coordinator. If the YP scores less than 14 and there are no concerns about risk of serious harm or homicide then risk can be managed within the YP’s safety plan. If the person at risk is a child under the age of 16 you must ensure your local Children’s Services are aware of the situation via your local safeguarding processes.